GUARD Focused Lab · Student Card

Privacy Choice Lab

Share the minimum, with permission and purpose.

GUARD focus: R · 10–12 minutes · Classes 8–10

Situation

Students are creating a class exhibition poster with an AI design tool. The tool invites them to upload photographs, notes and location details to personalise the result. The group is working on a shared school computer.

Learning objective

Apply purpose, permission, minimisation and device-safety checks before entering information into an AI system.

1. Classify the information

Classify each item for this task. Assume the tool's retention and training practices have not yet been checked.

Categories: Generally safe for this purpose, Permission or school check required, Unsafe or high risk to enter

The public URL of a museum page used as a design reference.

The page is public and contains no student information.

A class photograph showing identifiable students.

Several students have not agreed to upload their image to an external tool.

A student's live home location so the design can show a nearby landmark.

The exact location is unnecessary for the poster.

A classmate's health condition mentioned in project notes.

The information belongs to another student and is not needed for the design.

A teacher-provided anonymous list of colour preferences with no names or identifiers.

The list was prepared for this activity and checked for re-identification risk.

A spreadsheet containing student names, marks and attendance.

The poster does not require school records.

Reasoning:

2. Respond to the photo request

The tool produces better layouts if a class photograph is uploaded. What should the group do?

Evidence
  • The poster can be created with icons or a staged image instead.
  • Not every student has consented.
  • The tool's retention and training settings are unclear.
  1. Upload it because the project is educational and the image already exists.
  2. Use a lower-risk alternative; upload only if the school approves, the tool is appropriate and every affected person has the required consent.
  3. Crop one student out and upload the rest without asking because fewer people are visible.

Reasoning:

3. Apply the privacy checklist

Select the checks the group should complete before entering any non-public information.

Reasoning:

4. Make the final decision

Which decision best fits the project?

  1. Proceed using public references and anonymous teacher-prepared material; ask the teacher before any personal-data upload.
  2. Avoid every digital tool because privacy can never be managed.
  3. Upload all available material, then delete the final poster after submission.

Reasoning:

Final reflection

What evidence or stakeholder consideration most affected your decision?